⚖️ AI Policy Tracker
The regulation that actually binds AI builders, by region — status, who it affects, and the next deadline. Curated and reviewed quarterly; the news strip below is live.
Risk-based rules for AI systems: bans on unacceptable-risk uses (live), GPAI/foundation-model duties (live since Aug 2025), high-risk system requirements next.
Who must care: Anyone selling AI products/features into the EU, model providers above compute thresholds.
Next: High-risk system obligations — August 2026
No comprehensive federal AI law; policy moves through executive orders, NIST AI RMF, and agency enforcement (FTC on deceptive AI claims).
Who must care: Federal contractors, companies making AI marketing claims.
Next: Watch FTC enforcement actions and NIST framework updates
Colorado: duties for high-risk AI in consequential decisions (effective 2026). California: transparency and training-data disclosure laws. More states following.
Who must care: AI used in hiring, lending, housing, insurance decisions for US consumers.
Next: Colorado AI Act effective June 2026
Digital Personal Data Protection Act governs training/usage data; MeitY advisories ask platforms to label under-tested models and prevent unlawful content.
Who must care: Anyone processing Indian users’ personal data; consumer AI deployments in India.
Next: DPDP rules implementation milestones through 2026
Generative AI services need security assessment and filing; synthetic content must be labeled (explicit + implicit watermarks since Sept 2025).
Who must care: Any generative AI service reachable from mainland China.
Next: Ongoing enforcement; algorithm filing requirements
No AI statute; sector regulators apply principles, AI Security Institute evaluates frontier models. Copyright/AI consultation ongoing.
Who must care: Frontier labs (AISI evals), AI products in regulated UK sectors.
Next: Copyright & AI legislation outcome
First binding international AI treaty (human rights, democracy, rule of law) — signed by EU, US, UK and others; ratifications pending.
Who must care: Signal of where national law converges next.
Next: National ratifications
- サム・アルトマンに対して妹が起こした性的虐待訴訟は原告が第三者診断を拒否したため判事が棄却 https://gigazine.net/news/20261021-sam-altmans-sexual-abuse-lawsuit-dismisses/bluesky-ai · 2h
- job that doesn’t use ai job where ai is banned job where executives understand the limits of ai and the difference between ai and llm ai…bluesky-ai · 2h
- The best Anthropic could do with all the copyrighted work it has stolen and continues to steal is light an even larger obscene amount mone…bluesky-ai · 4h
- Anthropic’s AI safety bill has a judge-shaped The proposal could block a model if 50+ people might die—but federal agencies couldn’t stop …bluesky-ai · 5h
- Anthropic's draft AI safety bill ties model shutdowns to court orders and a clear 50-death threshold, but auditors self-certify and critics…bluesky-ai · 5h
- Judge dismisses Sam Altman’s sister’s sexual abuse lawsuittheverge-ai · 6h
- Anthropic pitches AI safety bill that may block a model if 50+ people could be killedbluesky-ai · 6h
- Anthropic pitches AI safety bill that may block a model if 50+ people could be killedtechcrunch-ai · 6h
- Draft artificial intelligence legislation circulated by Anthropic would permit dozens of projected deaths before triggering government inte…bluesky-ai · 9h
- I had this debate with my kids over Itch's AI policy. They require generative AI disclosure. If you build your own game engine with LLM as…bluesky-ai · 10h
Not legal advice — always verify against the linked official sources.